<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.8.4" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>From Hero to Humbug</title>
	<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 7: 1913:  The North Pole and Bradley Land</title>
		<description>The first book advocating Dr. Cook as the true discoverer of the North Pole was published in April 1913.  It was the work of Edwin Swift Balch.



Balch was by no means a person of no standing.

Born in 1857, he was the son of a famous Philadelphia lawyer, and a ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2247</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Arctic Rumors: What the Inughuit said about Dagtikorssuaq&#8217;s journey to the Big Navel</title>
		<description>

Readers of this blog may remember a long series on the so-called “Eskimo Testimony” that ran in 2023 and 2024 in nineteen installments.  Those posts have now all been withdrawn.

The author thought of revising them based on considerable new or additional information, but after reviewing them decided instead to ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2233</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature: Part 6 1912-13: New Editions of My Attainment of the Pole</title>
		<description>No legitimate publisher would touch Cook’s narrative in book form in 1911, so he formed his own “Polar Publishing Company” to issue and promote it and manage the lectures he planned to give after its publication.



T. Everett Harre was a subeditor of Hampton’s Magazine at the time Benjamin Hampton secretly ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2213</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 5: 1912: A Negro Explorer at the North Pole</title>
		<description>

Peary had a falling out with Matt Henson after the return of his attempt to reach the North Pole in 1909 over his attempt to prevent him from going on the lecture platform.  Peary was especially disturbed to learn that Henson planned to exhibit some of his own photographs, ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2202</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dr. Cook Artifacts 12: Blue-eyed Eskimo dolls</title>
		<description>

On December 21, 1909, Dr. Cook’s “proofs” that he had reached the North Pole in 1908 were rejected by the special commission set up by the University of Copenhagen to examine them.  Immediately he was branded nothing but a cheap fake, just as Peary had said he was.  ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2183</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Crocker Land Diaries: mythmaking, mirage and murder in the Far North</title>
		<description>

The author has recently published a new study drawing on original sources.  It is now available on Amazon.com.

In 1907, Robert E. Peary first claimed that when he stood on the heights of Axel Heiberg Island in June 1906, he sighted a distant land to the northwest.

Peary named it “Crocker ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2170</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 4: 1911: My Attainment of the Pole</title>
		<description>This is the fourth in an occasional series that will examine the published literature in book form relevant to the details of the Polar Controversy. These books will be discussed in the order they were published. 

The quintessential book of the Polar Controversy is My Attainment of the Pole, Dr. ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2148</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 3: 1911: A Tenderfoot with Peary</title>
		<description>This is the third in an occasional series that will examine the published literature in book form relevant to the details of the Polar Controversy. These books will be discussed in the order they were published. 



Peary always had a strict rule that no expedition member could write anything about ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2129</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 2: 1911: Did Peary Reach the Pole?</title>
		<description>This is the second in an occasional series that will examine the published literature in book form relevant to the details of the Polar Controversy. These books will be discussed in the order they were published. 



It took less than a year before the first book appeared doubting Peary’s claim ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2120</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Polar Controversy Literature Part 1: 1910: The North Pole</title>
		<description>This is the first in an occasional series that will examine the published literature in book form relevant to the details of the Polar Controversy.  These books will be discussed in the order they were published.  The first is Peary’s personal narrative of his alleged “discovery of the ...</description>
		<link>http://humbug.polarhist.com/news/?p=2101</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
